The business landscape in 2026 does not tolerate digital inefficiencies. As off-the-shelf software increasingly relies on rigid, subscription-heavy models that lock your data into walled gardens, mid-market enterprises and growing...
Technical due diligence protects all sides of a transaction — investors need clarity on risk before committing capital, acquirers need to know what they’re buying, and founders benefit from a credible third-party view that builds confidence.
Pre-investment technical risk assessment — understand what you’re backing before the term sheet is signed. Covers codebase quality, architecture scalability, security posture, and team capability in plain language your investment committee can act on.
Pre-acquisition technical assessment — understand the true cost of integration, identify technical debt that affects valuation, and surface risks that should influence deal structure before contracts are signed.
A credible, independent technical assessment of your own platform — giving you a clear picture of where you stand before investors ask, and a remediation plan for anything that could create friction in the due diligence process.
Our technical due diligence framework covers the four domains that determine whether a technology platform is an asset or a liability — assessed independently, scored objectively, and explained in terms investors understand.
We assess the codebase for maintainability, test coverage, technical debt, dependency hygiene, and engineering standards — using static analysis tools alongside manual expert review. We quantify how much the debt will cost to address and how it will affect future development velocity.
We assess the security posture across authentication, authorisation, data handling, secrets management, dependency vulnerabilities, and infrastructure configuration — identifying exposures that could represent regulatory risk, reputational risk, or material liability to an investor or acquirer.
We evaluate the system architecture for scalability, resilience, single points of failure, vendor lock-in, and fit for the growth trajectory implied by the investment thesis — identifying architectural decisions that will become constraints or require expensive rework as the business scales.
We assess the engineering team’s skills, processes, tooling maturity, documentation standards, and key-person dependency risk — identifying whether the team can execute the product roadmap, and what capability gaps would need to be filled to support the growth plan implied by the investment.
Our investor-ready report covers 12 assessment areas across 4 domains — rated, explained, and ranked by materiality so your investment committee knows exactly where the risks are and how significant they are.
| Assessment area | Domain | What we look for | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codebase maintainability | Code Quality | Complexity, modularity, naming conventions, dead code | |
| Test coverage & quality | Code Quality | Unit, integration & e2e coverage, test reliability | |
| Dependency & supply chain | Code Quality | Outdated / vulnerable packages, licence risks | |
| Authentication & authorisation | Security | Auth mechanism, RBAC, session handling, MFA | |
| Secrets & credential management | Security | Hardcoded secrets, rotation policies, vault usage | |
| Data protection & compliance | Security | Encryption, PII handling, GDPR/HIPAA exposure | |
| Scalability & performance | Architecture | Bottlenecks, database design, caching, load handling | |
| Resilience & availability | Architecture | Single points of failure, DR posture, HA design | |
| Vendor & platform risk | Architecture | Lock-in, concentration risk, key service dependencies | |
| Engineering skills & depth | Team | Technical range, seniority distribution, skill gaps | |
| Key-person dependency | Team | Bus factor, knowledge distribution, succession risk | |
| Process & delivery maturity | Team | CI/CD, code review, documentation, Agile practice |
From access-controlled code review and stakeholder interviews to a board-ready investor report and remediation roadmap — everything needed to make an informed technology investment decision.
Static analysis, manual code review, dependency audit, and test coverage measurement — across all relevant repositories — producing a quantified technical debt estimate and code quality score with specific evidence for each finding.
Automated vulnerability scanning plus manual security review — covering authentication, secrets management, data handling, infrastructure configuration, and dependency vulnerabilities — ranked by severity and regulatory impact.
Architecture documentation review and technical interviews with the engineering leadership — producing an architecture diagram, scalability assessment, single point of failure map, and vendor dependency risk analysis.
Structured interviews with engineering leads, senior developers, and product management — assessing skills distribution, key-person risk, delivery process maturity, and the team’s capability to execute the roadmap
A clear, structured report in language your investment committee understands — executive summary with recommendation, domain scorecards, prioritised findings by materiality, remediation cost estimates, and overall deal risk rating.
For every material finding, a prioritised remediation recommendation — with effort estimate, business impact, and suggested timing — giving investors and acquirers a clear view of what fixing the issues will cost and how long it will take.
Our technical due diligence process completes in 5–10 business days depending on platform complexity. Click each stage to explore what happens.
Transaction briefing, access agreement & NDA execution
Repo access, tooling setup & initial scan
Docs review, architecture interviews & diagram
Auth review, data handling & vulnerability analysis
Interviews, skills matrix & delivery review
Findings synthesis, scoring & investor report
We agree on the scope of the assessment — what needs to be reviewed, timeline, access requirements, and deliverable format — and execute NDAs with all parties before any access to code, systems, or personnel is granted.
The four principles behind every technical due diligence engagement we deliver — and why our reports give investors the confidence to act.
We have no commercial relationship with the company being assessed — no existing contracts, no future sales interest. Our assessment is structured to surface the truth, not validate a narrative. Investors rely on that independence to trust our findings.
Our reports are written by senior engineers who have built and operated production systems — then translated into language your investment committee understands. Technical findings come with business context, not just code snippets.
Due diligence windows are tight. We're structured to complete most assessments in 5–10 business days — with interim findings available earlier for time-critical situations — without sacrificing depth or accuracy.
Every finding in our report comes with a materiality rating, a remediation recommendation, and an effort estimate — giving investors and acquirers the data to negotiate, structure conditions, or price risk, not just a list of things that are wrong.
Repulsive questions contented him few extensive supported. Of remarkably thoroughly he appearance in. Supposing tolerably applauded or of be.
The business landscape in 2026 does not tolerate digital inefficiencies. As off-the-shelf software increasingly relies on rigid, subscription-heavy models that lock your data into walled gardens, mid-market enterprises and growing...
Your brilliant business idea is stuck on a whiteboard. Meanwhile, your competitors are shipping custom code, scaling their infrastructure, and capturing your market share. It hurts to watch potential customers...
Not just metrics — milestones earned by our clients and our team.
Your trusted technology partner, building solutions that drive real growth.
Software Development
Cloud Services
Consulting
Mobile App Development
Digital Marketing
© 2026 Created with Intellihub IT Solutions
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.
